Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40829181›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2025

KRAS: the Achilles' heel of pancreas cancer biology.

Kristina Drizyte-Miller, Taiwo Talabi, Ashwin Somasundaram, Adrienne D Cox, Channing J Der

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. High-Sensitivity ctDNA Analysis Uncovers Relevant Signals Missed by NGS in Pancreatic Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A targeted combination therapy achieves effective pancreatic cancer regression and prevents tumor resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  13. Variable efficacy of the non-covalent KRASNPJ precision oncology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Pancreatic cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. KRAS Inhibitors in Pancreas Cancer: Facts and Hopes about the Immunotherapy We Have All Been Waiting for.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristina Drizyte-MillerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Taiwo TalabiDepartment of Medicine.
Ashwin SomasundaramLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Adrienne D CoxLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Channing J DerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Funding

Integrated Training in Cancer Model SystemsT32CA009156 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DER, CHANNING J. · 1985 to 2020
$19.7M
SToP Cancer SPORE: Developmental Research ProgramP50CA257911 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Jen Jen Yeh · 2022 to 2026
$12.9M
Washington University SPORE in Pancreatic CancerP50CA196510 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAWKINS, WILLIAM G · 2016 to 2020
$10.9M
Project 4: The role of codon bias in RAS tumorigenesisP01CA203657 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DER, CHANNING J. · 2016 to 2020
$7.9M
Targeting undruggable RAS for cancer treatmentR35CA232113 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DER, CHANNING J. · 2018 to 2024
$6.3M
BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF RAS ONCOGENESR01CA042978 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DER, CHANNING J. · 1986 to 2017
$5.9M
Identification of synthetic lethal interactors in pancreatic cancerU01CA199235 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI COX, ADRIENNE D, DER, CHANNING J. · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA203657NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196510NCI NIH HHS P50 CA257911NCI NIH HHS R01 CA042978NCI NIH HHS R35 CA232113NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009156NCI NIH HHS U01 CA199235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic landscape of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is well-established and dominated by four key genetic driver mutations. Mutational activation of the KRAS oncogene is the initiating genetic event, followed by genetic loss of function of the CDKN2A, TP53, and SMAD4 tumor suppressor genes. Disappointingly, this information has not been leveraged to develop clinically effective targeted therapies for PDAC treatment, where current standards of care remain cocktails of conventional cytotoxic drugs. Nearly all (~95%) PDAC harbors KRAS mutations, and experimental studies have validated the essential role of KRAS mutation in PDAC tumorigenic and metastatic growth. Identified in 1982 as the first gene shown to be aberrantly activated in human cancer, KRAS has been the focus of intensive drug discovery efforts. Widely considered "undruggable," KRAS has been the elephant in the room for PDAC treatment. This perception was shattered recently with the approval of two KRAS inhibitors for the treatment of KRASG12C-mutant lung and colorectal cancer, fueling hope that KRAS inhibitors will lead to a breakthrough in PDAC therapy. In this Review, we summarize the key role of aberrant KRAS signaling in the biology of pancreatic cancer; provide an overview of past, current, and emerging anti-KRAS treatment strategies; and discuss current challenges that limit the clinical efficacy of directly targeting KRAS for pancreatic cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalMutationPancreatic NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)AnimalsHumansKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID40829181
PMCPMC12352898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.