ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2025
Quantitative functional profiling of ERCC2 mutations deciphers cisplatin sensitivity in bladder cancer.
Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proliferation- and cytotoxic immune signatures identify chemotherapy-responsive bladder tumors in a molecular subtype dependent manner.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Functional assays for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant analysis: new tools and their applications.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Review
- Review
- Complete pathological response in patients with bladder cancer: predictors and outcomes.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
- Perioperative treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer in the era of immunotherapy.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor gene alterations can serve as predictive biomarkers for therapy response. The nucleotide excision repair (NER) helicase ERCC2 carries heterozygous missense mutations in approximately 10% of bladder tumors, and these may predict sensitivity to cisplatin treatment. To explore the clinical actionability of ERCC2 mutations, we assembled a multinational cohort of 2,012 individuals with bladder cancer and applied the highly quantitative CRISPR-Select assay to functionally profile recurrent ERCC2 mutations. We also developed a single-allele editing version of CRISPR-Select to assess heterozygous missense variants in their native context. From the cohort, 506 ERCC2 mutations were identified, with 93% being heterozygous missense variants. CRISPR-Select pinpointed deleterious, cisplatin-sensitizing mutations, particularly within the conserved helicase domains. Importantly, single-allele editing revealed that heterozygous helicase-domain mutations markedly increased cisplatin sensitivity. Integration with clinical data confirmed that these mutations were associated with improved response to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Comparison with computational algorithms showed substantial discrepancies, highlighting the importance of precision functional assays for interpreting mutation effects in clinically relevant contexts. Our results demonstrate that CRISPR-Select provides a robust platform to advance biomarker-driven therapy in bladder cancer and supports its potential integration into precision oncology workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.