Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40829151›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Exploring the Application of AI and Extended Reality Technologies in Metaverse-Driven Mental Health Solutions: Scoping Review.

Aliya Tabassum, Ibrahim Ghaznavi, Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Junaid Qadir

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aliya Tabassum *Computer Science and Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9384-7053
Ibrahim Ghaznavi *Information Technology University, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3049-3330
Alaa Abd-Alrazaq *AI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7695-4626
Junaid Qadir *Computer Science and Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9466-2475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health systems worldwide face unprecedented strain due to rising psychological distress, limited access to care, and an insufficient number of trained professionals. Even in high-income countries, the ratio of patients to health care providers remains inadequate to address demand. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and extended reality (XR) are being explored to improve access, engagement, and scalability of mental health interventions. When integrated into immersive metaverse environments, these technologies offer the potential to deliver personalized and emotionally responsive mental health care.

objectiveThis scoping review explores the state-of-the-art applications of AI and XR technologies in metaverse frameworks for mental health. It identifies technological capabilities, therapeutic benefits, and ethical limitations, focusing on governance gaps related to data privacy, patient-clinician dynamics, algorithmic bias, digital inequality, and psychological dependency.

methodsA systematic search was conducted across 5 electronic databases-PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar-for peer-reviewed literature published between January 2014 and October 2024. Search terms included combinations of "AI," "XR," "VR," "mental health," "psychotherapy," and "metaverse." Studies were eligible if they (1) involved mental health interventions; (2) used AI or XR within immersive or metaverse-like environments; and (3) were empirical, peer-reviewed articles in English. Editorials, conference summaries, and articles lacking clinical or technical depth were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, with Cohen κ values of 0.85 and 0.80 indicating strong interrater agreement. Risk of bias was not assessed due to the scoping nature of the review. Data synthesis followed a narrative approach.

resultsOf 1288 articles identified, 48 studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies varied in design and scope, with most studies conducted in high-income countries. AI applications included emotion detection, conversational agents, and clinical decision-support systems. XR interventions ranged from virtual reality-based cognitive behavioral therapy and exposure therapy to avatar-guided mindfulness. Several studies reported improvements in patient engagement, symptom reduction, and treatment adherence. However, many studies were limited by small sample sizes, single-institution settings, and lack of longitudinal validation. Ethical risks identified included opaque algorithmic processes, risks of psychological overdependence, weak data governance, and the exclusion of digitally marginalized populations.

conclusionsAI and XR technologies integrated within metaverse settings represent promising tools for enhancing mental health care delivery through personalization, scalability, and immersive engagement. However, the current evidence base is limited by methodological inconsistencies and a lack of long-term validation. Future research should use disorder-specific frameworks; adopt standardized efficacy measures; and ensure inclusive, ethical, and transparent development practices. Strong interdisciplinary governance models are essential to support the responsible and equitable integration of AI-driven XR technologies into mental health care. The narrative synthesis limits generalizability, and the absence of a risk of bias assessment hinders critical appraisal.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesHumansARaugmented realitycognitive behavioral therapydigital therapeuticsextended reality ethicsimmersive technologymental wellnesspsychotherapytelehealthvirtual interventionsvirtual realityVRXR ethics

Identifiers

PMID40829151
PMCPMC12405795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.