ArticleBlood advances2025
International consensus guidelines for the conduct and reporting of CAR T-cell clinical trials in AML.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute leukemia, version 2.0.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Guideline
- Application and challenges of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Successful autologous T cell apheresis in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies, solid tumors, and brain tumors.Cytotherapy · 2026Article
- Phase 1 Study of KITE-222, an Autologous CLL-1-Directed CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Targeting urological cancers with CAR-T cell therapy: current landscape and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Potential of CAR-CIK Cells in Acute Leukemia Relapsed Post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractEarly clinical experience with the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been beset by high rates of toxicities and low rates of response. We convened an international workshop with the goal of bringing investigators in the field of AML-directed CAR T-cell therapy together to facilitate discussion of challenges and to brainstorm potential solutions. Based on discussions at the workshop, it was evident that (1) treating and targeting AML with CAR T cells is associated with unique clinical challenges, and (2) variability in clinical trial design, definitions of toxicities, correlative data collection, and reporting methods hinders the field's ability to compare study outcomes and to develop best practices. Further, details of fundamental CAR T-cell attributes and key correlates of efficacy and toxicity were not uniformly reported in published studies, limiting understanding of barriers to success. These observations led to a concerted team effort in which experts in basic/translational science and clinical investigation from pediatric and adult centers worked together to streamline key attributes of clinical trial design and reporting. Consensus criteria were discussed and agreed upon, leading to the creation of a white paper. These guidelines aim to bolster the overall quality of AML-directed CAR T-cell research, allow for comparisons across trials, and inform the next phase of development of AML-directed CAR T-cell therapies that we hope will improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.