ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2025
Recognition Versus Ability to Use External Aids: An Exploratory Item Response Analysis of the Functional External Memory Aid Tool.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeItem response theory (IRT) offers an alternative psychometric approach that can provide more specific measurement information beyond classical test theory (CTT). The Functional External Memory Aid Tool (FEMAT) is a performance-based assessment that evaluates everyday strategy use. Developed using CTT, the FEMAT item stems measure various compensation skills such as recognizing when to use a strategy, the ability to use a strategy, and information recall. This study aimed to investigate how the FEMAT aligns with the principles of IRT and whether IRT can provide additional insights about client performance from FEMAT item stems.
methodWe conducted a preliminary analysis of item responses from the initial FEMAT psychometric evaluation data set (
resultsThe overall item analysis revealed a normal distribution of response categories, although some items had low frequencies in Response Categories 1 or 3. The IRT assumptions were met, with evidence of unidimensionality and local independence, and all FEMAT items fit within the acceptable range for the model. Item stems measuring recognition of when to use everyday strategies were significantly more difficult than those assessing the ability to use everyday strategies.
conclusionsThis IRT analysis expanded the psychometric evidence examining the FEMAT and revealed additional measurement properties of the tool. The item-level detail from the IRT analysis can inform score interpretation and identify potential areas for improvement or refinement of the measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.