ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2025
Emergency Department Visits Within Ninety Days of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background contextEndoscopic lumbar decompression is growing in popularity as an alternative to an open approach for management of lumbar radiculopathy. Although endoscopic procedures are inherently less invasive, emergency department (ED) visits may occur postoperatively. Although many quality improvement initiatives target readmissions, ED visits may be more common, be a marker of quality of care, affect patient satisfaction, and contribute to healthcare resource utilization and costs. PURPOSE: To characterize the timing and risk factors of ED utilization following single-level endoscopic lumbar decompression. STUDY DESIGN/
settingRetrospective database review. PATIENT SAMPLE: PearlDiver M165Ortho data set. OUTCOME MEASURES: Timing of ED utilization following endoscopic lumbar decompression, independent risk factors of ED utilization following endoscopic lumbar decompression, and revision surgery rate among patients who use the ED.
methodsSingle-level endoscopic lumbar decompression patients were identified from the PearlDiver M165Ortho data set. Patients were excluded if additional procedures were performed, if they were younger than 18 years, if they had a concomitant diagnosis of trauma, neoplasm, or infection on the day of surgery, or if there was not 90-day follow-up in the data set. Patient factors were extracted, including age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, region of the country in which their procedure was performed (Midwest, Northeast, South, West), and patient insurance plan (Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare).The incidence, timing, and frequency of ED utilization within 90 days of endoscopic lumbar decompression was then determined. A baseline rate of weekly ED utilization for the study cohort was calculated based on average weekly ED utilization at 52 to 56 weeks postoperatively. Patient factors predictive of postoperative ED utilization were then determined by univariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsOf 1397 endoscopic lumbar decompression patients identified, 151 (10.8%) visited the ED within 90 days of surgery. Of note, approximately 29% of these ED visits occurred in the first 2 postoperative weeks.Multivariate analysis revealed several independent predictors of ED utilization following endoscopic lumbar decompression, including female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.57 relative to male), higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (OR 1.15 per two-point increase), and Medicaid coverage (OR 2.49 relative to Medicare).Of patients who visited the ED, 97 (64.2%) were readmitted. Less than 11 patients who used the ED underwent revision surgery in the subsequent 2 weeks.
conclusionsFollowing endoscopic lumbar decompression, close to 11% of patients were found to visit the ED in the 90 days following their surgery, most commonly in the first two postoperative weeks. Several factors were independently associated with ED utilization, including female sex, greater comorbidity burden, and having Medicaid insurance. Notably, ED utilization rates following endoscopic lumbar decompression are similar to those following open lumbar decompression previously published in the literature. Thus, patients undergoing endoscopic decompression are at similar risk of postoperative ED utilization-surgeons should be aware of this risk and care pathways should be modified to reduce the occurrence of postoperative ED visits in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.