ArticleThe oncologist2025
Prognostic covariates associated with outcomes in patients with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vascular complications in NPM1-Mutated acute myeloid leukemia: clinical features and prognosis.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Low-VAF TP53-Mutated AML Displays Distinct Biological Features in a Single-Center Cohort.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNPM1 mutacute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients have greater heterogeneity. However, data on the comprehensive integration of clinical and genetic data in NPM1mutAML patients are limited, especially in the FLT3 inhibitor era.
methodsData from consecutive AML patients with NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt (n = 203) and NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDmut (n = 115) were reviewed.
resultsIn NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt patients, in multivariate analyses male sex, WBC count ≥19 × 109/L, bone marrow blasts ≥ 70%, NPM1 non-A/B/D type mutation, TET2 mutation and measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity after the first cycle of consolidation were significantly-associated with poor relapse-free survival (RFS) and survival. Based on the adverse prognostic covariates, patients were classified into low-risk (score 0-2, n = 113, 64%), intermediate-risk (score 3, n = 43, 25%) and high-risk (score ≥4, n = 20, 11%) subgroups, with significant differences in 3-year probabilities of RFS and survival (all P values < .001). In NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDmut patients who did not undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in CR1, single FLT3-ITD mutation, NPM1 non-A/B/D type mutation, TET2 mutation and MRD positivity after the first cycle of consolidation, poor RFS; platelet ≤60 × 109/L and albumin <40 g/L, poor survival. Patients were classified into low-risk (score 0-2) allo-HSCT (n = 9, 11%) or non-allo-HSCT (n = 26, 31%), and high-risk (score ≥ 3) allo-HSCT (n = 8, 10%) or non-allo-HSCT (n = 40, 48%). The first 3 subgroups had comparable outcomes, but were significantly superior to the high-risk non-allo-HSCT subgroup (all P values for trend = .001-.010).
conclusionsWe identified high-risk AML patients with NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt or NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDmut who might consider more intensive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.