ArticleFamily medicine2025
The Prevalence and Stress Impact of Decredentialing as a Form of Gender Microaggression: A CERA General Membership Study.
Article in Family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThis study sought to quantify the anecdotally reported experience of decredentialing in the profession of medicine, specifically as it applies to gender. Decredentialing is defined as the experience of being addressed by first name without permission or being mistaken as a nonphysician provider.
methodsEight questions regarding decredentialing microaggressions and resultant stress reactions were submitted as part of the 2023 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance general membership survey.
resultsWomen physicians reported significantly higher rates of unauthorized first name use by patients (15% vs 3% for men patients; 7% vs 3% for women patients). Women physicians also reported significantly higher rates of decredentialing by being mistaken as a nonphysician by patients (39.8% frequent vs 1.1%), clinical staff (13.0% frequent vs 0.7%), and other physicians (10.9% frequent vs 1.1%). Women respondents reported more substantial stress responses after unauthorized first-name use (36.9% more stressful vs 6.3%) and mistaken roles (47.7% more stressful vs 8.4%). Subgroup analysis of self-identified underrepresented in medicine (URiM) populations showed significantly higher rates of microaggressions among URiM women physicians compared to men physicians and in total URiM respondents versus non-URiM respondents.
conclusionsWomen physicians experience the gender microaggression of decredentialing via unauthorized first-name use by patients and being mistaken for a nonphysician more frequently than men physicians. Women physicians also more frequently experience a stress response from these microaggressions. Decredentialing, long acknowledged anecdotally by women physicians, is a valid gender microaggression disproportionately affecting women physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.