Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40828916›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine2025

Impact of Grade Inquiries and Appeals on Clerkship Directors.

Kimberly Schiel, Kelly M Everard, Joel J Heidelbaugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kimberly SchielDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
Kelly M EverardDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
Joel J HeidelbaughDepartments of Family Medicine and Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesGrade inquiries and appeals are a common occurrence in family medicine clerkships, and they are a source of stress to clerkship directors (CDs). This survey sought to establish the rate of grade inquiries and appeals in family medicine clerkships, to determine whether CDs perceive these rates to be increasing, and to determine whether grade appeals or inquiries contribute to CD burnout or to changes in grading criteria.

methodsData were collected as part of the 2024 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) clerkship directors survey. Respondents answered questions about the rates of grade inquiries and appeals, whether CDs feel burned out, and whether they ascribe the cause of their burnout to be related to grade inquiries/appeals.

resultsThe response rate was 53%. In a given academic year, 6% of family medicine students initiated grade inquiries, and 3% initiated grade appeals. Correlations showed that the percentage of students initiating grade appeals was associated with general burnout, grade appeal related burnout, and the desire to give up their CD role. CDs who felt less supported in their decisions about grade appeals were significantly more likely to report burnout or to want to resign from that role.

conclusionsGrade inquiries and appeals contribute to CD burnout. CDs who experience more inquiries/appeals or who perceive the number of inquiries/appeals to be increasing may modify their grading criteria to avoid grade appeals. Supporting CDs in their decisions regarding grade inquiries and appeals is important.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalClinical ClerkshipEducational MeasurementFaculty, MedicalFamily PracticeAdultFemaleHumansMaleStudents, MedicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40828916
PMCPMC12611201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.