ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Spatio-temporal learning from molecular dynamics simulations for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combination therapy strategies in engineeredCell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Learnable protein representations in computational biology for predicting drug-target affinity.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Review
- Progress and Bottlenecks for Deep Learning in Computational Structure Biology: CASP Round XVI.Proteins · 2026Article
- Evaluating data partitioning strategies for accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding free energy changes in mutated proteins.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe field of protein-ligand binding affinity prediction continues to face significant challenges. While deep learning (DL) models can leverage 3D structural information of protein-ligand complexes, they perform well only on heavily biased test sets containing information leaked from training sets. This lack of generalization arises from the limited availability of training data and the models' inability to effectively learn from protein-ligand interactions. Since these interactions are inherently time-dependent, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations offer a potential solution by incorporating conformational sampling and providing interaction rich information.
resultsWe have developed MDbind, a dataset comprising 63 000 simulations of protein-ligand interactions, along with novel neural networks capable of learning from these simulations to predict binding affinity. By utilizing MD as data augmentation, our models achieved state-of-the-art performance on the PDBbind v.2016 core set and an external test set, the free energy perturbation (FEP) dataset. Additionally, when trained on the full MD simulations, the models demonstrated less biased predictions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code for neural networks is available at https://github.com/ICOA-SBC/MD_DL_BA. The models, the results and the training/validation/test sets are available for download at https://zenodo.org/records/10390550. The MDbind trajectories are being transferred to the MDDB: https://mmb-dev.mddbr.eu/#/browse? option=mdbind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.