ArticlePloS one2025
Maize-bean intercropping mediates reduction in arthropod intraguild predation better than low-intensity farming-Stable isotope evidence.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crop-field structural management for boosting arthropod pest bio-control is increasingly recognized as an environmentally sustainable alternative to chemical pesticides. However, how natural pest regulation outcomes may be undermined by intraguild predation among pest natural enemies is seldom investigated in cereal crops-fields. Here we use δ13C and δ15N stable isotope analyses to assess intraguild predation amongst five arthropod taxa, comparing this to their consumption of three pest taxa, and test how such patterns relate to farming system (low-intensity/conventional) or cropping method (monoculture/intercropping) across 15 small non-transgenic maize fields. Overall, consumption of pests exceeded intraguild predation, especially Lepidoptera contribution to wasp, predatory beetle and predatory bug diets. However, every predatory taxon integrated diet carbon from all the others, particularly from predatory bugs. Predatory beetles showed the strongest connection to pest consumption while predatory bugs had the strongest connection to intraguild diet carbon. In general, wasps, predatory beetles and spiders exhibited more significant orientation towards pest consumption while predatory bugs were more of intraguild predators, but ants incorporated both food-sources nearly proportionately. Regarding influence of cropping options, pest consumption exceeded intraguild predation in intercropped compared to monoculture farms while for farming system, low-intensity rather than conventional systems promoted higher consumption of Lepidoptera pests. Low-intensity farming also enhanced intraguild consumption of predatory bugs. By contrast, while conventional farming boosted beetle and bug pest consumption, it was also associated with enhanced intraguild predation overall. Generally, therefore, field-level maize-field structural complexity through intercropping may be more impactful than chemical-free farming for mediating intraguild predation and hence boosting natural pest suppression. These findings, the first to quantitatively compare multiple-taxa pest consumption to intraguild predation in maize-fields, are important in informing appropriate agronomic management interventions within cereal-crop farming landscapes to maximize top-down pest biocontrol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.