ArticlePloS one2025
The role of ephaptic coupling and gap junctional coupling in modulating the initiation and dynamics of reentrant arrhythmias.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The electrophysiology of ventricular cell pairs.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac myocytes synchronize through electrical signaling to contract heart muscles, facilitated by gap junctions (GJs) located in the intercalated disc (ID). GJs provide low-resistance pathways for electrical impulse propagation between myocytes, considered the primary mechanism for electrical communication in the heart. However, research indicates that conduction can persist without GJs. Ephaptic coupling (EpC), which depends on electrical fields in the narrow ID between adjacent myocytes, offers an alternative mechanism for cardiac conduction when GJs are impaired. Research suggests that EpC can enhance conduction velocity (CV) and reduce the likelihood of conduction block (CB), particularly when GJs are impaired, demonstrating the anti-arrhythmic potential of EpC. Reduced GJ communication increases the susceptibility of heart to arrhythmias due to ectopic or triggered activity, highlighting the pro-arrhythmic effect of GJ uncoupling. However, the interplay between GJs and EpC, and their roles in the initiation, dynamics, and termination of arrhythmias, remain unclear. Reentry, characterized by a loop of electrical activity, is a common mechanism underlying arrhythmogenesis in the heart. This study aims to explore the interplay between EpC and GJs on reentry initiation and its underlying dynamics. Specifically, we employed a two-dimensional (2D) discrete bidomain model that integrates EpC to simulate ephaptic conduction during reentry. We quantitatively assessed the outcomes of reentry initiation and the resulting dynamics across different levels of EpC, GJs, and initial perturbations. The results show that sufficiently strong EpC (i.e., sufficiently narrow clefts) tends to suppress reentry initiation, resulting in absent or non-sustained reentrant activity, while also introducing transient instability and heterogeneity into the cardiac dynamics. In contrast, relatively weak EpC (wide clefts) support sustained reentry with a stable rotor. Furthermore, we found that sufficiently strong EpC can lower the maximal dominant frequency observed during reentrant activity. Overall, this suggests that strong EpC exerts an anti-arrhythmic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.