Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40828580›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2026

Phylogenetic Resolution and Conflict in the Species-Rich Flowering Plant Family Leguminosae.

Rong Zhang, Gregory W Stull, Jian-Jun Jin, Yin-Huan Wang, Ying Guo, Zhi-Yun Yang, Hong-Tao Li, Kai-Lun An, Joseph L M Charboneau, Ryan A Folk and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. PhytoKeys · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Rong ZhangKey Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops & Germplasm Bank of Wild Species & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Crop Wild Relatives Omics, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Panlong District, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China.
Gregory W StullDepartment of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 10th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20560, USA.
Jian-Jun JinLaboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research, The New York Botanical Garden, 2900 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, New York, NY 10458-5126, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-9198
Yin-Huan WangSchool of Primary Education, Chongqing Normal University, 1 Tuanshan Town, Beibei District, Chongqing 400700, China.
Ying GuoYunnan Key Laboratory of Dai and Yi Medicines, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, 1076 Yuhua Road, Chenggong District, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China.
Zhi-Yun YangGermplasm Bank of Wild Species & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Crop Wild Relatives Omics, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Panlong District, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China.
Hong-Tao LiKey Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops & Germplasm Bank of Wild Species & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Crop Wild Relatives Omics, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Panlong District, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China.
Kai-Lun AnDepartment of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 10th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20560, USA.
Joseph L M CharboneauDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 1105 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Ryan A FolkDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, 295 Lee Boulevard, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Domingos CardosoInstituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Pacheco Leão 915, Jardim Botânico, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22460-030, Brazil.
Luciano Paganucci de QueirozDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Av. Transnordestina, s/n, Novo Horizonte, Feira de Santana, BA 44036-900, Brazil.
Anne BruneauInstitut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale and Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, 4101 Sherbrooke Street East, Montréal, QC H1X 2B2, Canada.
Pamela S SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 3215 Hull Road, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Douglas E SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 3215 Hull Road, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Stephen A SmithDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 1105 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2035-9531
De-Zhu LiGermplasm Bank of Wild Species & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Crop Wild Relatives Omics, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Panlong District, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4990-724X
Ting-Shuang YiGermplasm Bank of Wild Species & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Crop Wild Relatives Omics, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Panlong District, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7093-9564

Funding

Basic Research Program 202301AT070310Basic Research Program 202401AT070164Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo E-26/200.153/2023National Key Research Development Program of China No. 2022YFC2601202]National Natural Science Foundation of China 32270247]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tree of life is central to evolutionary biology, yet resolving deep, recalcitrant phylogenetic relationships remains challenging due to complex processes such as incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), hybridization, and polyploidization. Although previous phylogenetic studies have advanced our understanding of Leguminosae (Fabaceae), a species-rich and ecologically diverse family, many deep relationships at the tribal and higher levels remain unresolved. Incorporating newly generated genome skimming data for 231 species with previously issued plastid genomic, mitochondrial genomic, and transcriptomic data, we reconstructed a phylogeny of the family using whole plastomes, 39 mitochondrial genes, and 1559 low-copy nuclear genes, achieving dense taxonomic sampling across almost all recognized tribes and major unplaced lineages. Our results supported the monophyly of the six subfamilies and 49 recognized tribes, identified 10 clades worthy of recognition as new tribes in subfamily Papilionoideae, and clarified many contentious relationships. However, nuclear-nuclear and cytonuclear conflicts persist at multiple nodes among trees inferred from different data sets and analytical methods. We proposed the most probable resolution for 22 contentious nodes by applying nuclear gene tree quartet analysis with corroboration from support of nuclear maximum likelihood and ASTRAL trees. Our results indicate that ILS significantly contributes to observed phylogenetic conflicts, whereas gene flow represents an additional and previously underappreciated factor that mainly contributes to cytonuclear conflicts, particularly along the branches of the Angylocalyceae + Dipterygeae + Amburaneae (ADA) clade and Wisterieae. These processes likely underlie recalcitrant phylogenetic relationships, such as those within the 50-kb inversion clade of Papilionoideae. Our study uses multiple data partitions and analytical methods to resolve contentious phylogenetic relationships in Leguminosae, resulting in a robust phylogenomic framework to guide further investigations in this economically important and exceptionally diverse family.

Indexed as

FabaceaePhylogenyGenome, PlantClassificationFabaceaegenomic conflictphylogenetic signalrapid radiation

Identifiers

PMID40828580
PMCPMC13017209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.