ArticleSystematic biology2026
Phylogenetic Resolution and Conflict in the Species-Rich Flowering Plant Family Leguminosae.
Article in Systematic biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Legume genome structures and histories inferred from Cercis canadensis and Chamaecrista fasciculata genomes.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Concatenation, Conflict, and Complexity: Genealogical Heterogeneity Mimics Substitutional Heterogeneity for Nucleotide Model Selection.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Dispersed repeats and inverted repeat expansion drive major plastomic rearrangements inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The tree of life is central to evolutionary biology, yet resolving deep, recalcitrant phylogenetic relationships remains challenging due to complex processes such as incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), hybridization, and polyploidization. Although previous phylogenetic studies have advanced our understanding of Leguminosae (Fabaceae), a species-rich and ecologically diverse family, many deep relationships at the tribal and higher levels remain unresolved. Incorporating newly generated genome skimming data for 231 species with previously issued plastid genomic, mitochondrial genomic, and transcriptomic data, we reconstructed a phylogeny of the family using whole plastomes, 39 mitochondrial genes, and 1559 low-copy nuclear genes, achieving dense taxonomic sampling across almost all recognized tribes and major unplaced lineages. Our results supported the monophyly of the six subfamilies and 49 recognized tribes, identified 10 clades worthy of recognition as new tribes in subfamily Papilionoideae, and clarified many contentious relationships. However, nuclear-nuclear and cytonuclear conflicts persist at multiple nodes among trees inferred from different data sets and analytical methods. We proposed the most probable resolution for 22 contentious nodes by applying nuclear gene tree quartet analysis with corroboration from support of nuclear maximum likelihood and ASTRAL trees. Our results indicate that ILS significantly contributes to observed phylogenetic conflicts, whereas gene flow represents an additional and previously underappreciated factor that mainly contributes to cytonuclear conflicts, particularly along the branches of the Angylocalyceae + Dipterygeae + Amburaneae (ADA) clade and Wisterieae. These processes likely underlie recalcitrant phylogenetic relationships, such as those within the 50-kb inversion clade of Papilionoideae. Our study uses multiple data partitions and analytical methods to resolve contentious phylogenetic relationships in Leguminosae, resulting in a robust phylogenomic framework to guide further investigations in this economically important and exceptionally diverse family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.