Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40828535›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Differential Use of Depression and Anxiety Medications in Adults With a History of Cancer.

Daniela Miro-Rivera, Ryan A Norris, Oyomoare L Osazuwa-Peters, Jillian H Hurst, Justin M Barnes, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniela Miro-RiveraYale College, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Ryan A NorrisREACH Equity Summer Undergraduate Research Program, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Oyomoare L Osazuwa-PetersDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Jillian H HurstDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Justin M BarnesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Nosayaba Osazuwa-PetersREACH Equity Summer Undergraduate Research Program, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Depression and anxiety disproportionately impact cancer survivors. Sociodemographic factors frequently impact access to cancer care; however, it is unclear if these factors are associated with access to pharmacological care for mental and behavioral health conditions. Objective: To evaluate antidepressant and anxiolytic use among cancer survivors compared with the general US population and identify associations between sociodemographic factors and medication use. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this cross-sectional study, data from 2016 to 2018 from the National Health Interview Survey were analyzed in January 2024. The nationally representative, population-based sample consisted of respondents to the National Health Interview Survey aged 18 to 85 years without a history of cancer residing in the US. Main outcomes and measures: Eligible respondents completed the Adult Functioning and Disability supplements and had nonmissing outcomes. Self-reported antidepressant and anxiolytic use were the main outcomes, estimated through multivariable logistic regression analyses, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Results: Among 53 117 respondents, 48 026 individuals (21 592 aged 40-64 years [41.8%]; 24 589 female [51.2%]; 8260 Hispanic [17.2%], 5859 non-Hispanic Black [12.2%], and 29 584 non-Hispanic White [61.6%]) reported no history of cancer and 5091 individuals (1624 aged 40-64 years [37.7%]; 2927 female [57.5%]; 321 Hispanic [6.3%], 361 non-Hispanic Black [7.1%], and 4159 non-Hispanic White [81.7%]) reported a history of cancer. After adjustment for sociodemographic variables, cancer survivors were more likely to report taking antidepressants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18-1.49) and anxiolytics (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.23-1.54) compared with the general population. Among cancer survivors, non-Hispanic Black individuals had lower odds of taking antidepressants (aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.91) and anxiolytics (aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.94) compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. Cancer survivors on Medicare (aOR,  2.20; 95% CI, 1.39-3.50) or Medicaid (aOR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.18-2.84) were more likely to take anxiolytics compared with privately insured individuals. Cancer type was also associated with medication use; respondents with a history of brain cancer were more likely to take antidepressants (aOR, 5.59; 95% CI, 1.79-17.46), and those with a history of pancreatic cancer were more likely to take antidepressants (aOR, 5.30; 95% CI, 1.64-17.18) and anxiolytics (aOR, 6.74; 95% CI, 2.11-21.55) compared with those with a history of breast cancer. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, cancer survivors were significantly more likely to take medications for depression and anxiety compared with noncancer survivors, underscoring the importance of mental health in cancer. However, our findings suggested disparities associated with this, with non-Hispanic Black patients exhibiting decreased use.

Indexed as

Anti-Anxiety AgentsAnxietyCancer SurvivorsDepressionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth SurveysHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedAnti-Anxiety Agents

Identifiers

PMID40828535
PMCPMC12365704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.