Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40828533›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Healthy Food Benefit Programs, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, and Food Security.

Melissa A Knox, Jamie Wallace, Barbara Baquero, KeliAnne Hara-Hubbard, Jessica Jones-Smith

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melissa A KnoxDepartment of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle.
Jamie WallaceDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Barbara BaqueroDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
KeliAnne Hara-HubbardDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Jessica Jones-SmithDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SARA R. CURRAN · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
The FRESH Study: The Fresh Bucks racial equity, socioeconomic & health outcomes studyR01HL168190 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Barbara I Baquero, Jessica C Jones-Smith · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL168190NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Diet quality, including fruit and vegetable intake, is a determinant of health, yet fresh fruits and vegetables are inaccessible to many lower-income and marginalized households. Healthy food benefit programs may reduce health disparities by increasing fruit and vegetable consumption. Objectives: To estimate the outcomes of a $40 per month healthy food benefit program on food security and diet. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cohort study with randomly assigned treatment groups composed of participants seeking enrollment in Fresh Bucks, a healthy food benefit program for lower-income populations in Seattle, Washington. Participants were randomly assigned to enrollment in the program and to a waiting list. Outcomes were examined at baseline (October 2021) and follow-up (June 2022). Exposure: Two exposure groups were examined. First, random assignment to newly receive program benefits for 6 months vs assignment to a waiting list. Second, random assignment to be disenrolled from program benefits vs continued enrollment for 6 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: A modified version of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Fruit and Vegetable Screening Questionnaire was used to calculate daily frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption as a continuous outcome and a binary indicator of consuming less than 3 vs 3 or more times per day. Food security was measured using the 2-item Hunger Vital Signs screener. Results: A total of 1973 participants were included, with 757 who received the program and 1216 who were disenrolled (1339 [68%] aged ≥60 years; 1007 [51%] Asian; 209 [11%] Black; 523 [27%] White). The program was associated with a 5.5 percentage point (pp) (95% CI, 0.05-10.91 pp) increase in food security and a 7.5 pp (95% CI, 0.39-14.52 pp) increase in the proportion of participants consuming fruit and vegetables 3 or more times per day. Continuous fruit and vegetable consumption changes were null; however, differential outcomes by income, language, and race and ethnicity were found. Examining these same outcomes in a population assigned to disenrollment, lower fruit and vegetable intake and food security were found vs those who remained in the program. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of a healthy food benefit program found reduced food insecurity and improved fruit and vegetable consumption in a lower-income population randomly assigned to program enrollment.

Indexed as

DietDiet, HealthyFood AssistanceFood SecurityFood SupplyFruitVegetablesAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPovertyWashington

Identifiers

PMID40828533
PMCPMC12365700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.