AI-augmented remote robotic plastic surgery: a rigorous appraisal of potential and proof needs.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Economic sustainability of a newly established robotic thoracic surgery programme in a public healthcare system: early experience from a high-volume latin American centre.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026
   Observational
2. Force sensing and haptic feedback in robotic surgery: a bibliometric and knowledge-mapping analysis of technological evolution and translational trajectories.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026
   Review
3. Artificial intelligence in knee osteotomy: evolution of alignment assessment and surgical decision-making.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026
   Review
4. Learning adaptation experiences of circulating nurses in robot-assisted femoral neck fracture surgery from a learning-curve perspective: a qualitative study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.