ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the sleep health index using self-report measures and wearable-derived sleep metrics.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to validate the Korean version of the Sleep Health Index (K-SHI) using both self-report measures and objective sleep indices from wearable devices.
methodsA total of 204 adults (mean age 30.35 ± 9.76 years, 64.71% female) were recruited and categorized into insomnia and good sleeper groups. Participants completed the K-SHI, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Objective sleep indices were collected using a wearable device (Fitbit Inspire 3) for 4 weeks. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and analyses for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity, and group comparisons were conducted.
resultsCFA supported a three-factor model (x
conclusionsThese results demonstrate the validity and reliability of the K-SHI, incorporating both subjective self-report measures and objective sleep data from wearable devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40828457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.