ArticleCell and tissue banking2025
Modulatory effect of three cartilaginous niches on cartilage regeneration from different chondrocyte sources in a goat model.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The body has evolved three types of cartilage: hyaline, elastic, and fibrocartilage. Modern tissue engineering techniques can harvest different types of chondrocytes, expand them in vitro, and use them to repair various cartilage defects. However, the modulatory effect of different cartilaginous niches on the type of regenerated cartilage after the implantation of chondrocytes from different origins remains unknown. In this study, three typical types of cartilage-auricular (elastic cartilage), articular (hyaline cartilage), and meniscus (fibrocartilage)-were investigated. Chondrocytes derived from these cartilages were mixed with Pluronic gel and implanted into three different cartilaginous niches for one month using a goat model. Our results demonstrated that in the articular cartilage environment, regenerated cartilage from auricular chondrocytes lost elastin expression, and cartilage from meniscus chondrocytes lacked a fibrous structure, showing reduced type I collagen and increased type II collagen expression, all resembling a hyaline cartilage-like structure. In the auricular cartilage environment, regenerated cartilage from articular chondrocytes did not express elastin, maintaining a hyaline cartilage-like structure, while fibrocartilage chondrocytes failed to form regenerated cartilage. In the fibrocartilage environment, regenerated cartilage from auricular and meniscus chondrocytes did not exhibit a fibrous structure, with weak type I collagen expression and positive type II collagen expression. Regenerated cartilage from auricular chondrocytes did not express elastin and did not transform into fibrocartilage. This study provides valuable insights into how different cartilaginous niches influence the characteristics of regenerated cartilage, offering potential implications for improving cartilage repair strategies in tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40828452What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.