Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2026
Oral anticoagulants-related bleeding: what happens in the emergency room? The Galeno study.
Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are no real-world data on the modalities and outcomes of managing major or life-threatening bleeding related to oral anticoagulants in the emergency room (ER). The primary endpoint of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the therapeutic regimen ER physicians started to manage bleeding and 30-day mortality. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the appropriateness of DOACs prescription and hospital admissions. Data were collected using RedCap. Patient's general characteristics, laboratory test results, therapy started in the ER to manage bleeding, patient transfer to another hospital department or discharge home, and 30-day mortality were recorded. A total of 526 consecutive patients were enrolled, 67% treated with DOACs and 33% with VKAs. Reversal of oral anticoagulants was successfully performed in a minority of patients, while in a percentage ranging from 30.5% for dabigatran to 60.2% for VKAs, patients did not receive any treatment, even if necessary. Thirty-day mortality was 11% and 17% for patients treated with DOACs and VKAs, respectively. Major bleeding conferred a higher risk of death (OR = 2.95, 1.42-6.16). Compared with VKAs, DOACs therapy reduced the risk of death by 57% (OR = 0.43, 0.26-0.72). Excessive doses were administered to 10.8%, 13%, 18%, and 19% of patients treated with rivaroxaban, edoxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, respectively. In these patients, major bleeding occurred in a percentage ranging from 66.7% to 94.7% depending on the drug administered. Overall, 25.8% of patients, treated primarily with DOACs, were discharged. The management of oral anticoagulant-related major or life-threatening bleeding in the ER appears poor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40828441What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.