ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025
Pharmacovigilance analysis of metabolic and nutritional adverse reactions associated with entecavir and tenofovir using the FDA adverse event reporting system database.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEntecavir and tenofovir are the first-line therapies for chronic hepatitis B. Although effective, long-term use may cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs), affecting the metabolic and nutritional systems. However, many such risks are not comprehensively reflected in the current drug labels.
aimThis study aimed to systematically detect and validate metabolic and nutritional ADR signals associated with entecavir and tenofovir using the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
methodThe FAERS reports from Q1 2004 to Q3 2024 were extracted. Reports that listed entecavir (4820 cases) or tenofovir (76,452 cases) as the primary suspect drugs were screened for metabolic and nutritional ADRs coded by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Disproportionality analysis (reporting odds ratio [ROR], proportional reporting ratio [PRR]) and the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) were applied. Positive signals were defined as fulfilling three criteria: ROR 95% CI lower bound > 1, PRR ≥ 2 with χ
resultsEight positive ADR signals were detected for entecavir, and the top five in descending order of the number of reports are: lactic acidosis [46 reports; ROR(95%CI) = 10.06(7.53-13.44)], metabolic acidosis [11 reports;ROR(95%CI) = 2.36(1.3-4.26)], hypophosphatemia [9 reports;ROR(95%CI) = 8.3(4.32-15.97)], cell death [5 reports;ROR(95%CI) = 16.58(6.89-39.9)], and hyperlactacidaemia [5 reports;ROR (95%CI) = 13.63(5.67-32.8)]. For tenofovir, 16 positive signals were identified, with vitamin D deficiency[1,149 reports;ROR(95%CI) = 27.7(26.03-29.48)], hypophosphatemia [270 reports;ROR(95%CI) = 7.88(6.98-8.9)], dyslipidaemia [72 reports; ROR(95%CI) = 2.85(2.26-3.6)], mitochondrial toxicity [66 reports; ROR(95%CI) = 17.68(13.73-22.76))],and fat redistribution [30 reports; ROR(95%CI) = 28.81(19.59-42.37)] being the most prominent. Most signals were not addressed in the existing labels.
conclusionEntecavir and tenofovir exhibit under-recognized risks of mitochondrial toxicity, electrolyte imbalance, and bone metabolism disorders. Routine monitoring of the serum phosphorus, vitamin D, and lactate levels is recommended. Drug labeling should be updated to include newly identified risks such as hypokalemic alkalosis and fat redistribution. Further research on mitochondrial mechanisms and gender-based differences is needed to optimize individualized therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40828435What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.