ArticleOecologia2025
Can lowland plants shifting upwards outcompete mountain plants in terms of pollination efficiency?
Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many plant species are moving to higher elevations due to global warming, but the effects of these elevational shifts on plant-pollinator interactions are not well understood. This study aimed to examine how flower visitation and seed set of lowland plants change after they shift uphill, and whether they compete for pollinators with plants native to the mountains. We conducted an experiment using two plant groups: lowland species pre-planted in a greenhouse and transplanted to both lowland and mountain sites, and mountain species. Pollinators were recorded at lowland sites for planted species and at mountain sites for both planted and native species. We also used pan traps in white, yellow, and blue colours to collect pollinators at both sites. Afterwards, seed sets of the planted species were counted to compare pollination success between elevations. Flower visitation rates on planted species were not significantly affected by elevation, although pollinator abundance in pan traps was higher in the mountains. The pollinator spectrum varied across elevations and plant species, influenced by flower and pan trap colour. However, planted species produced more seeds at lowland sites, indicating higher pollination success there. Overall, we found no evidence of competitive advantage for range-shifting lowland species in terms of pollination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40828370What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.