ArticleCommunity mental health journal2025
Community/Crisis Cafés: Perspectives of Service Users and Carers Scoping Review.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community/Crisis Cafés offer an alternative, out-of-hours mental health support by providing a safe, peer/clinician-supported environment for individuals in crisis. These cafés utilise peer support models that draw on personal experience, fostering connections and aiding in crisis management. Despite the growing global implementation of these cafés, limited research exists on how service users and carers experience and benefit from them. This study aims to explore the perspectives of service users and carers on accessing and utilising support through community/crisis cafés both nationally and internationally. A scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and included keyword searches of eight databases (Academic Search Complete, APA PsychInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science), combined with grey literature searches of LENSUS, Health Service Executive, WHO Global Index, NHS, and Open Grey. Backward and forward chaining of references was also completed to ensure all literature was sourced. Papers were limited to 2010-2023 and in English. Covidence was used for the screening process, ten papers met the review criteria and are reported as per the PRISMA-ScR checklist and PRISMA flow diagram. The findings of ten papers on service users and carers experiences indicate that Community/Crisis Cafés can have a positive impact on mental health management, alleviate social isolation, and reduce emergency department use. However, challenges such as consistency in service delivery and accessibility were noted. Further research and ongoing evaluation are necessary to fully understand the efficacy and limitations of this alternative co-produced, community mental health service delivery model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.