ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
Company Sponsored Platform Trials: Recommendations and Lessons Learned from Cross-Industry Interviews.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the evolving landscape of clinical research, platform trials have emerged as a revolutionary model, initially designed as a collaborative framework enabling multiple organizations and companies to develop treatments for a single disease under a unified master protocol. Recent years more and more pharmaceutical and biotech companies utilize the framework to screen and prioritize their internal assets, evolving to another type of platform trials with increasing popularity: company sponsored platform trials. This type of platform trials has gained substantial traction and presented unique opportunities and challenges, particularly in the oncology sector, where there are multiple drug candidates being developed as monotherapy or combination therapies within the same organization. To enhance understanding and optimize the conduct of the company sponsored platform trials, the DahShu Innovative Design Scientific Working Group (IDSWG) Oncology Master Protocol subteam conducted cross-industry interviews with professionals involved in seven platform trials from seven different pharmaceutical companies. This paper aims to provide insights into the opportunities and challenges of designing, conducting, and reporting platform trials within a single pharmaceutical company, drawing on the learnings from these interviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40828355What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.