Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40828285›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

History of Mosquito Transgenesis: A Perspective in Review.

Anthony A James, Rebeca Carballar-Lejarazú

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anthony A JamesDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. aajames@uci.edu.
Rebeca Carballar-LejarazúDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of mosquito transgenesis technologies was driven by the need to make stable and heritable modifications to the genomes of these important insects for a variety of basic and applied objectives. While a number of transient assay systems for gene expression analyses were developed, transposable elements (TEs) were the first tools that allowed the production of genetically manipulated strains for studies that involve the complex biology of these insects and their ability to transmit pathogens. TEs have been replaced more recently for most applications by the adaptation of Cas9/guide RNA techniques, but they are still useful in randomly sampling genomes as enhancer traps and identifying neutral regions in the genome free of insertion site effects. Coupled with the Cas9/guide RNA technologies, precise editing and engineering of the genetic mechanisms responsible for much of the biology of these interesting and important insects is now possible.

Indexed as

CulicidaeGene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Transposable ElementsGene EditingDNA Transposable ElementsCas9/guide RNAsFluorescent proteinsGene drivepiggyBacPopulation replacement/modificationPopulation suppressionTransient expressionTransposable elements

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.