Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40828273›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Identification of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism from Insect Genomic Data.

Alejandro Nabor Lozada-Chávez, Mariangela Bonizzoni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alejandro Nabor Lozada-ChávezDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. nabor.lozada@gmail.com.
Mariangela BonizzoniDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common type of genetic variation among individuals. SNPs are widely used to estimate genomic divergence, population structure, and natural selection, as well as to identify associations between genomic variants and phenotypic traits. However, the identification of SNPs in non-model species or from field-derived samples may still be challenging and would benefit from standardized protocols. The identification of SNPs from raw sequencing data, such as those obtained from a standard Illumina library, involves many processing steps and the use of diverse sets of tools, where the choice of different parameters significantly affects the results. Here, we present a pipeline for a genome-wide identification of SNPs from raw Illumina reads. This pipeline is composed of three major steps that encompass the GATK Best Practices and include quality control of the raw reads, mapping of short reads to a reference genome, recalibration of the alignment, variant calling, quality control for variant calling, and filtering of candidate SNPs. The steps of this pipeline are accompanied by publicly available scripts and datasets used for the identification of SNPs in the genome of the mosquito Aedes aegypti, an invasive species and a major arboviral vector worldwide.

Indexed as

AedesComputational BiologyGenome, InsectGenomicsInsectaPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareGATKGenome-wideInsectsPipelineProtocolSNP identificationVariant calling

Identifiers

PMID40828273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.