ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2025
Nutrient quality, environmental impact, and cost of Chinese diets: a benchmarking optimization approach.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plasma metabolites, metabolic risk score and colorectal cancer risk: a prospective cohort study.European journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDesign Chinese diets that are more nutritious, and have lower environmental footprints and cost, while accounting for diet preference.
methodsFood consumption data of 4889 men and 5435 women adults were collected via 3-d 24-h dietary recalls in five regional subgroups (Metropolitan cities, Northeast, East, Southwest, and Central region) covered by the China Health and Nutrition Survey 2011. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) model was applied to benchmark diets that had higher adherence to food-based dietary guidelines. Optimized diets were obtained by combining benchmarked diets in the studied population that complied with different sustainability goals: maximized nutrient quality (Nutrient Rich Diet score, NRD15.3), minimized greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), minimized diet cost, maximized diet preference, and an integrated scenario. Furthermore, trade-offs between sustainability indicators were assessed.
resultsWhen nutrient quality, environmental impacts, and diet cost were optimized within each regional subgroup, the NRD15.3 increased 22-35%, GHGE decreased 17-38%, total water use (TWU) decreased 14-35%, land use (LU) decreased 21-33%, and diet costs decreased 23-32% compared to observed diets. When optimizing diet preference, more than 90% of food consumption remained similar as observed diets. When the four objectives were considered simultaneously, all indicators improved ~ 20%. In trade-off analyses, higher nutrient quality was accompanied by increased environmental impacts and diet cost.
conclusionDiet improvement towards more nutritious, environmentally sustainable, affordable, and culturally acceptable is feasible in China. During the transition of the food system, iterative applications of the DEA model to changed dietary habits can inform policymakers to finetune diet recommendations towards sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40828251What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.