Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40828237›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2026

ESR Essentials: juvenile idiopathic arthritis; what every radiologist needs to know-practice recommendations by the European Society of Paediatric Radiology.

Sílvia Costa Dias, Celine Habre, Pier Luigi Di Paolo, Paola d'Angelo, Thomas A Augdal, Oskar W Angenete, Damjana Kljucevsek, Emilio J Inarejos Clemente, Laura Tanturri de Horatio, Karen Rosendahl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Decoding adolescent TMJ osteoarthritis with multimodal machine learning.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sílvia Costa DiasDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.
Celine HabrePediatric Radiology Unit, Radiology Division, Diagnostic Department, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pier Luigi Di PaoloDepartment of Imaging, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Paola d'AngeloDepartment of Imaging, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Thomas A AugdalDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT the Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Oskar W AngeneteDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Damjana KljucevsekDepartment of Radiology, University Children's Hospital Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Emilio J Inarejos ClementeDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging. Sant Joan de Deu Barcelona Children Hospital, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura Tanturri de HoratioDepartment of Imaging, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Karen RosendahlDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT the Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. karen.rosendahl@unn.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-2169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is a major contributor to chronic diseases, affecting around 1-2 in 1000 children under the age of 16. With modern treatments, the morbidity has been reduced; however, there is increasing evidence that many, if not most, children with JIA will have a chronic disease with ongoing activity into adulthood. Many studies discuss the possibility of an early window of opportunity in which patients have the best chance of responding to therapy, thereby underscoring the importance of timely and appropriate imaging. Children typically present at 4-5 years of age with one or more stiff and painful joints. If JIA is suspected, the child should undergo an ultrasound of the involved joint(s), performed by a radiologist with experience in paediatric imaging. If this is normal, with no abnormal laboratory tests and low clinical suspicion of JIA, no further imaging is required. If there is inconsistency between ultrasound and clinical findings, then they should proceed to MRI, including intravenous contrast, of the involved joint. Additional radiographs, or low-dose CT for the axial joints to examine for potential destructive change, deformation, or growth abnormalities, should be considered. In children presenting with monoarthritis, bacterial infection must be ruled out. KEY POINTS: Ultrasound is the initial modality in the diagnosis of JIA, and if there is inconsistency between ultrasound and clinical findings, MRI should be performed. Radiography for the assessment of destructive change, deformity, and malalignment should be considered, alternatively, low-dose CT for the temporomandibular and sacroiliac joints and the cervical spine. Knowledge of normal imaging features in children is mandatory.

Indexed as

Arthritis, JuvenileChildChild, PreschoolEuropeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPediatricsRadiologySocieties, MedicalUltrasonographyArthritisChildDiagnostic imaging(Juvenile)Magnetic resonance imagingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40828237
PMCPMC12953336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.