ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Trends in medicare reimbursement for the resection of spinal tumors: 2000-2021.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recent fiscal expansion and rising healthcare expenditures, reimbursement rates for specific surgical procedures like spinal tumor resections remain underexplored. This study analyzes trends in real-value Medicare Part B reimbursements for spinal tumor resections over a 21-year period by querying the Medicare Part B database using relevant CPT codes from 2000 to 2021. Data included the aggregate number of procedures, allowed charges, and payments per procedure. Average payments per procedure and expected patient payments were calculated based on the 20% coinsurance of Medicare Part B. Compound Annual Growth Rates (CAGR) were determined and adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and the Medical Care component (CPI-MEDSL), representing out-of-pocket expenses. Generally speaking, the volume of spinal tumor surgeries increased by 28.77%, and average gross reimbursement rose by 13.57% without inflation adjustment. After adjusting for inflation, average reimbursement decreased by 27.83%. The CAGR analysis showed a 1.23% annual increase in procedures and a 0.64% annual increase in unadjusted reimbursements, but a 1.66% annual decrease when adjusted for inflation. Patient payments increased by 31.55% (CAGR of 1.31%); however, when adjusted for the 201.4% rise in medical care costs, patient payments effectively declined by 44.63%, with an annual decrease of 2.92%. Despite increased nominal healthcare spending, inflation-adjusted reimbursement rates for spinal tumor resections have declined. This trend raises concerns regarding the sustainability of current reimbursement policies and their impact on maintaining advancements in spinal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.