ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2025
Delivering Care Consistent With the Psychosocial Standards-Provider Report: Implementing the Standards Together-Engaging Parents and Providers in Psychosocial Care (iSTEPPP) Study.
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative effectiveness trial for universal psychosocial screening with the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) across 18 childhood cancer programs in the United States: adoption, penetration, and health equity.Implementation science : IS · 2026Trial
- Implementation and Delivery of a Comprehensive Bereavement Program in Pediatric Palliative Oncology.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Implementation of a Caregiver Distress Screening Initiative in a Pediatric Oncology Healthcare Setting: A Quality Improvement Project.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- "They had to watch": How parents perceive the suffering of siblings of children with cancer.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based Standards for Psychosocial Care for Children with Cancer and their Families were published in 2015. Determining how often care delivery practices and approaches align with the Standards is important for understanding the reach of the Standards. PROCEDURE: Medical (n = 73) and psychosocial (n = 99) providers from 129 of 197 (65%) Children's Oncology Group (COG) programs in the United States completed an online survey. Participants reported the frequency, timing, and psychosocial care delivery approaches for each Standard. Program size was considered, and the data were compared with those from a similar 2016 survey.
resultsUsing a 5-point scale, services consistent with the Standards are provided across programs-mean frequencies of 3.29-4.61 (5-point scale). Standards related to screening and monitoring (M = 4.42) are delivered more often than Standards related to intervention and support (M = 4.25), supportive care and bereavement (M = 3.88), and family and community (M = 3.72) (p < 0.001). Ratings of quality of care are near the midpoint of the scale. Findings are consistent with a 2016 report, although care related to family and community support was less frequent in 2023. Program size and provider discipline were not associated with quality or frequency.
conclusionsProviders report that psychosocial care aligned with the Standards is generally provided and perceive quality of care positively. Variability in types of care, frequency, and quality, and lack of change from when the Standards were first published, highlight the importance of improving the implementation of evidence-based approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.