ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
Recurrent Miscarriage and Infertility Services and Supports: A Qualitative Study of Views and Experiences in the Republic of Ireland.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent miscarriage (RM) and infertility are separately associated with psychological distress and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The dual experience is devastating for women/couples but is not considered in clinical guidance for RM or fertility care.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to explore healthcare professional (HCP) views on the provision of care to women and couples with RM and infertility in the ROI, as well as the experiences of women who use these services. SETTING AND
participantsWe recruited HCPs working in RM and fertility services and women with lived experience of two or more miscarriages who had undergone fertility care. Purposive sampling was used to include perspectives from multiple disciplines, lived experiences and geographical locations.
designWe conducted semi-structured interviews, virtually and in-person, between December 2022 and May 2023. These were audio-recorded, and the data were transcribed for subsequent reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsWe interviewed 16 HCPs and 17 women with lived experience. We actively generated four central themes during data analysis. 'Exploring all avenues'-stigmatisation and misinformation around RM and infertility impacted on seeking care. 'Exhausting all resources'-there were physical, emotional and financial implications with this dual experience. 'Separateness'-women felt remote from others and removed from services. 'No woman is an island'-supports came from multiple sources in various guises but were limited.
conclusionThe experience of RM and infertility is complex, with a profound impact on the lives of women and their partners. Alongside financial and psychological supports, there is a need for greater education and awareness of miscarriage and fertility. PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Our research group includes and collaborates with people with lived experience. Women were recruited through direct approach and social media, and their participation was voluntary with no financial remuneration. The experiences of women and their families offer keen insights into services and highlight areas requiring improvement and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.