ArticleActa orthopaedica2025
Superstition in arthroplasty: does a suspicious size or surgery date have a higher revision rate? A Dutch arthroplasty register study.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: The value of arthroplasty registries: from surveillance to societal impact.Acta orthopaedica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThere are still strong beliefs in medicine concerning things that bring "bad luck." It is unclear whether a suspicious component size or surgery date is related to "bad luck" in orthopedic surgery. We aimed to examine: (i) if a potentially unlucky femoral stem size 13 in total hip arthroplasty (THA), and (ii) if a possible unlucky surgery date, Friday 13th, in THA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have a higher revision rate.
methodsWe analyzed 611,050 THAs and TKAs, performed in the past 13 years using Dutch Arthroplasty Register data. The revision rate of uncemented femoral stem size 13 (Corail and Taperloc) in THA was compared with all other stem sizes of the same type. Furthermore, the revision rate of THA and TKA implanted on Friday 13th was compared with all other days and with other Fridays. Both were performed using competing risk analyses with death as competing risk and cause-specific multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.
resultsThe use of an uncemented Corail or Taperloc femoral stem size 13 in THA was associated with a lower revision rate (3.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3-4.0) compared with the revision rate of other femoral stem sizes (3.5%, CI 3.3-3.8) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, CI 0.65-0.87). TKA procedures on Friday 13th were not associated with increased revision rate (5.2%, CI 4.1-6.7) compared with procedures on other days (6.0%, CI 5.9-6.2) or on other Fridays (5.8%, CI 5.4-6.2) (HR 1.03, CI 0.80-1.32 and HR 1.01, CI 0.79-1.30, respectively). For THA, procedures on Friday 13th were associated with a higher revision rate (5.1%, CI 3.9-6.6) compared with procedures on other days (4.6%, CI 4.5-4.8) (HR 1.32, CI 1.04-1.67) but not compared with procedures on other Fridays (4.8%, CI 4.4-5.1) (HR 1.24, CI 0.97-1.58).
conclusionBased on national arthroplasty registry data, femoral stem size 13 in THA was associated with a lower revision rate. TKA procedures on Friday 13th were not associated with increased revision rate; however, in THA there seems to be an increased risk of revision in THA procedures performed on Friday 13th compared with other days, but not when compared with other Fridays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.