Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40827921›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2025

Bovine Endometrium Drives and Responds to Divergence of In Vitro Produced Conceptus Biochemistry.

Katheryn D Peterson, Mary A Oliver, Trevor F Freeman, Shankar P Poudel, Susanta K Behura, David Kakhniashvili, Daniel L Johnson, Rebecca R Payton, Tulio M Prado, Lew G Strickland and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bovine Endometrium Drives and Responds to Divergence of In Vitro Produced Conceptus Biochemistry.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Katheryn D PetersonDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1519-2565
Mary A OliverSchool of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2138-2434
Trevor F FreemanDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3888-8987
Shankar P PoudelDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7035-8516
Susanta K BehuraDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1057-2435
David KakhniashviliProteomics and Metabolomics Core Facility, University of Tennessee Health and Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4700-7176
Daniel L JohnsonProteomics and Metabolomics Core Facility, University of Tennessee Health and Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1600-6768
Rebecca R PaytonDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4262-1887
Tulio M PradoDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3388-1484
Lew G StricklandDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9280-4748
J Lannett EdwardsDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-9233
Elizabeth A ShepherdDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4153-2774
Jonathan E BeeverDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6156-0632
Thomas E SpencerDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2815-766X
Daniel J MathewDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7351-3865

Funding

USDA | National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)UT | AgResearch, University of Tennessee (UT AgResearch)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro produced (IVP) bovine embryos enhance herd genetics for important food production traits and support advanced reproductive technologies. However, less than 50% survive the first month of gestation after transfer to the surrogate. While the biochemical consequences of in vitro culture on the embryo before transfer have been well documented, less is known after transfer when the embryo interacts with the endometrium and pregnancy failure occurs. To investigate crosstalk between the IVP and in vivo derived (IVD) bovine conceptus and endometrium, a Day 16 conceptus-endometrial mono-culture and co-culture system was used, integrating transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. The IVP conceptus transcriptome (differentially expressed genes; DEG) diverged from the IVD conceptus but only after co-culture with endometrium (377 DEG; FDR < 0.05). Further, of the IVP conceptus DEG, 81 genes (21%) were associated with abnormal embryonic or fetal development. Significant biological processes associated with abundant endometrial DEG induced by IVP conceptuses were related to GTPase activity and the inflammatory response (FDR < 0.01), the latter of which may be associated with increased MHC class II expression, which was specific to IVP conceptuses. Proteomic analysis of culture media identified 1031 and 604 differentially abundant proteins (FDR < 0.05) associated with the IVD and IVP conceptus-endometrial co-cultures, respectively, compared to endometrium alone, indicating the proteomic environment surrounding the IVP conceptus may be suboptimal. Collectively, compared to the IVD conceptus, evidence suggests the endometrium drives and responds to divergence of IVP conceptus biochemistry, likely contributing to pregnancy failure.

Indexed as

Embryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentEndometriumAnimalsCattleCoculture TechniquesEmbryo Culture TechniquesFemaleFertilization in VitroGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalPregnancyProteomicsTranscriptomebovineconceptusendometriumproteometranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID40827921
PMCPMC12363384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.