SynthesisJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG2025
Interventions for Bowen's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions for Bowen's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bowen's disease (BD) is an intraepidermal malignancy that may progress to skin cancer, yet no study has compared interventions from randomized controlled trials (RCT). We synthesized RCT data to calculate lesion-specific initial clearance rates, long-term clearance rates, and cosmetic outcomes relative to placebo. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and trial registers up to September 30, 2024, and included nine studies (672 patients, 844 lesions). Interventions compared to placebo and ranked via network meta-analysis included surgery, imiquimod, photodynamic therapy (PDT), laser ablation (LA), laser-assisted PDT (LA-PDT), cryotherapy and 5-fluoruracil (5-FU). Bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The study was registered in PROSPERO prior to data extraction (CRD42024583966). All interventions showed higher lesion-specific clearance rates than placebo. Regarding initial clearance, LA-PDT ranked first, followed by surgery and LA. Surgery ranked first for long-term clearance, followed by LA-PDT and PDT. Cryotherapy and imiquimod ranked lowest for initial clearance and long-term clearance. PDT, LA-PDT, and 5-FU showed the best cosmetic outcome, while surgery had the worst. Limitations included moderate to high bias and study heterogeneity. Our findings support clinical decision-making for BD, identifying LA-PDT and PDT as effective options balancing efficacy and cosmetic results, and surgery as optimal for long-term clearance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.