SynthesisBrain and behavior2025
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Different Tenecteplase Doses With Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review With Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis to Determine the Optimal Dose.
Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Different Tenecteplase Doses With Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review With Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis to Determine the Optimal Dose.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different thrombolytic drugs in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke Beyond the 4.5-Hour Time Window: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy versus Intravenous Thrombolytics in Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage after Tenecteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis with Tenecteplase in Patients with Wake-Up Branch Atheromatous Disease.Translational stroke research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTenecteplase (TNK) is a novel thrombolytic agent gaining attention as an alternative to alteplase for treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of various TNK doses compared to alteplase, integrating recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and employing a frequentist network meta-analysis to identify the optimal dose while addressing existing evidence gaps.
methodsUp until December 2024, PubMed, Cochrane Central, and ScienceDirect were searched. Using Review Manager 5.4.1 for pairwise meta-analysis, the Risk Ratios (RR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were pooled under the random effects model. Additionally, R version 4.3.2 and the "netmeta" package were used to conduct a network meta-analysis for various dosages of the two thrombolytic drugs.
resultsThirteen RCTs, pooling 9,044 patients, were included in the quantitative synthesis. TNK was associated with a statistically significant improvement in the excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: [1.00, 1.08]; p = 0.03) compared to alteplase. No significant differences were observed between TNK and alteplase in terms of good functional outcome (mRS 0-2), poor functional outcome (mRS 5-6), major neurological improvement within 72 h, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), or mortality at 90 days. On network analysis, TNK 0.25 mg/kg showed significant improvement in excellent functional outcome (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: [1.01, 1.10]) and TNK 0.32 mg/kg in good functional outcome (1.30, 95% CI: [1.15, 1.48]) compared to alteplase. According to the P-score ranking, TNK 0.25 mg/kg was ranked as the best for achieving an excellent outcome (P-score = 0.86), and TNK 0.1 mg/kg as the worst (P-score = 0.16). For symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), alteplase 0.9 mg/kg was ranked as the best (P-score = 0.71), and TNK 0.4 mg/kg as the worst (P-score = 0.17).
conclusionTNK (0.25-0.32 mg/kg) demonstrates superior efficacy compared to alteplase in achieving functional outcomes for AIS, while alteplase remains safer regarding sICH. Optimal dosing favors TNK 0.25 mg/kg for efficacy, but safety considerations highlight the need for individualized thrombolytic selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.