Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40827509›Full record

Trial reportBJS open2025

Immediate versus early urinary catheter removal after gastrectomy under enhanced recovery after surgery protocols: randomized clinical trial.

Chen Wei, Gang Wang, Hai-Feng Wang, Hua-Feng Pan, Zhi-Wei Jiang, Mu-Wen Qu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative StudyEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06718114 (A Study on Early Removal of Urinary Catheter After Gastric Cancer Surgery Applying ERAS Protocols), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06718114 nacompletednot on this map

A Study on Early Removal of Urinary Catheter After Gastric Cancer Surgery Applying ERAS Protocols

TypeinterventionalSponsorAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineRan2021 to 2024Enrolled181ConditionsUrinary Catheter Removal After SurgeryArmsimmediate urinary catheter removal, early removal of urinary catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chen WeiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8351-8312
Gang WangDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Hai-Feng WangDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Hua-Feng PanDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Zhi-Wei JiangDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Mu-Wen QuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompliance with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in gastrectomy, including urinary catheter management, remains poor. This study evaluated the feasibility of immediate urinary catheter removal after radical gastrectomy.

methodsThis was a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial performed at a university-affiliated hospital in China. Patients undergoing radical gastrectomy were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to either immediate removal (IR) or early removal (ER) of the urinary catheter. The randomization sequence was computer generated; the investigators and patients were not blinded to group allocation. ERAS protocols were applied in all patients. The primary outcome measure was postoperative urinary retention with a non-inferiority margin of 10% to compare IR with ER. Secondary outcomes were patient comfort, patient anxiety, and depression. Data were analysed using intention-to-treat analysis.

resultsInitially, 248 patients were assessed for eligibility for this study. Data were analysed for 92 patients in the IR group and 89 patients in the ER group. The incidence of postoperative urinary retention was 4.4% and 3.4% in the IR and ER groups, respectively (P = 0.733; 1.0% difference, 95% confidence interval -4.6 to 6.6%). Patient comfort levels were significantly higher in IR than ER group (mean(standard deviation) Kolcaba General Comfort Questionnaire score 74.9(7.6) versus 72.5(8.0), respectively; P = 0.041).

conclusionIR of the urinary catheter after gastrectomy is feasible under ERAS perioperative care protocols. It does not increase the incidence of postoperative urinary retention and can provide a more comfortable postoperative experience. Successful IR implementation probably relies on multimodal analgesia and goal-directed fluid therapy. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06718114 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

Device RemovalEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryGastrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsUrinary CatheterizationUrinary CathetersUrinary RetentionAgedAnxietyChinaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Comforturinary retention

Identifiers

PMID40827509
PMCPMC12361889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.