Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40827494›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025

From 'What's This?' To 'I Grew It!': Evaluation of a School Nutrition Program in Queensland, Australia.

Leila Fathi, Charlotte Young, Anne Cleary, David Porter, Danielle Taylor, Mathew Dick, Charlotte Morrison, Li Kheng Chai, Zoe Nethery, Katherine Cacavas and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From 'What's This?' To 'I Grew It!': Evaluation of a School Nutrition Program in Queensland, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Leila FathiSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9228-1345
Charlotte YoungInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Anne ClearyInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
David PorterInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Danielle TaylorInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Mathew DickSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Charlotte MorrisonSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Li Kheng ChaiSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Zoe NetheryInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Katherine CacavasSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Robyn LittlewoodSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Mark RobinsonInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4911-7106

Funding

Health and Wellbeing QueenslandKing & Amy O'Malley TrustThe University of Queensland and Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedThis study aimed to evaluate the implementation and impact of the 'Pick of the Crop' (POTC) program. POTC is a whole-school nutrition program aimed at increasing opportunities for primary school students in Queensland to learn about and eat more vegetables and fruit (VF).

methodsA mixed-methods evaluation was undertaken that included analysis of school action plans, Most Signficant Change interviews and surveys with school champions, as well as focus groups with regional coordinators and programme managers. Data sources explored access to VF within the school and the perceived knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviour of staff and students regarding VF consumption. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were inductively coded and thematically analysed. Sources of data were triangulated to cross-validate key themes identified from interviews, focus groups, surveys and action plans.

resultsA total of 63 schools participated in the POTC evaluation. School staff reported high acceptability of POTC within schools for the first 2 years of its implementation. School staff considered the program feasible with the support of regional coordinators, strong curriculum links, networks with the community, and local leadership. Respondents from schools in their first and second year of implementation reported an increase in student knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards VF consumption. Schools in their second year of implementation reported higher levels of VF consumption among students, with some improvement to school policies, food culture and school networks.

conclusionsPOTC demonstrates an acceptable and feasible model that has potential for increasing consumption of VF among primary school students. Further research is required to determine long-term program efficacy with a larger sample size. SO WHAT: School-based nutrition programs should consider incorporating the capacity for flexibility within program structures, whereby schools determine context-specific priorities and the specific activities to be implemented. Recruiting dedicated regional coordinators is also important to ensure support is available to meet the individual needs of schools.

Indexed as

Health PromotionSchool Health ServicesSchoolsChildFemaleFocus GroupsFruitHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleProgram EvaluationQueenslandStudentsVegetableschildrenhealth promotionimplementationprogram evaluationschools

Identifiers

PMID40827494
PMCPMC12362328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.