ArticleAnimal genetics2025
Exploring genetic diversity and population structure of Myanmar indigenous chickens using double digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing.
Article in Animal genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study used double-digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of eight populations of Myanmar indigenous chickens (MICs). We conducted genetic diversity and population structure analyses of indigenous chickens from Myanmar and other Asian countries and commercial chickens. A total of 20 261 autosomal SNPs were used. The expected heterozygosity of the eight populations of MICs ranged from 0.259 ± 0.175 (MYN_FCN) to 0.282 ± 0.152 (MYN_YGN), and the observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.245 ± 0.187 (MYN_FCN) to 0.265 ± 0.164 (MYN_YGN). The population structure analyses suggested that MICs possessed a genetic cluster that is limited in many chicken populations in this study. In addition, three distinct groups were found among Myanmar and Asian populations. We then identified differentially selected regions (DSRs) among these groups to understand their differences: 48 DSRs between Myanmar fighting chickens and MICs, 54 DSRs between Myanmar fighting chickens and a group of Myanmar and Asian indigenous chickens, and 48 DSRs between MICs and a group of Myanmar and Asian indigenous chickens. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis revealed certain significant genes in those group-pairs. The results revealed genetic differences between Myanmar and other Asian chickens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.