Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40827366›Full record

ArticleUrology research & practice2025

A Novel Hybrid Surgical Technique for Large Renal Masses-Hybrid Technique of Laparoscopic-Assisted Open Radical Nephrectomy.

Bhavana Chowdary, Arjun Nagaraj, Dhanshekar Nalluru, Nagaraj Harohalli Krishnareddy, Koustubh Gaonkar, Abhishek Reddy, Dinesh Anne, Murali Velagapudi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology research & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bhavana ChowdarySapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9983-6048
Arjun NagarajSapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5573-0065
Dhanshekar NalluruSapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Karnataka, India.
Nagaraj Harohalli KrishnareddySapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Karnataka, India.
Koustubh GaonkarSapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0009-0007-3285-4720
Abhishek ReddySapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Karnataka, India.
Dinesh AnneSapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Karnataka, India.
Murali VelagapudiSapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The complex patient dynamic in India leads to diverse presentations of renal cell carcinoma, ranging from incidental small renal masses to large palpable renal masses. Minimally invasive surgical approaches pose challenges for patients with large renal masses (≥7 cm), prompting many urologists to opt for open radical nephrectomy. However, open surgery is associated with higher morbidity due to prolonged visceral exposure and increased intraoperative bleeding. Large renal masses often exhibit significant neovascularity, complicating dissection and elevating intraoperative blood loss risk. This problem led the authors to devise a novel hybrid technique of laparoscopic-assisted open radical nephrectomy (HLO-RN), which helps to decrease morbidity. In this article, the authors discuss this novel hybrid technique incorporating the benefits of both open and laparoscopic approaches (HLO-RN). Methods: The authors conducted an observational study to report the authors'. HLO-RN, in 5 patients with large renal masses (≥7 cm) suggestive of renal cell carcinoma. Patients with morbid obesity (BMI ≥40) were excluded. The hybrid technique involves initial laparoscopy, followed by open flank incision after vessel clipping. Conversion-to-open procedure can be adjusted based on intraoperative conditions. In patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus extension, conversion-to-open procedure is made after sequential clamping of renal vessels and IVC with or without hepatic mobilization. All the patients were followed for 6 months. Various parameters including patient characteristics, renal mass characteristics, staging, mean duration of laparoscopic and open procedures, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and duration of hospitalstay and duration to return to normal activity were recorded. Results: Five patients (mean age: 61.2 years) were included, with 2 presenting with venous tumor thrombus extension. The mean renal mass size was 10.7 cm (range: 7.8-14 cm). One patient with IVC Level I thrombus required open conversion after sequential vessel clamping due to significant neovascularity. Partial laparoscopic mobilization was feasible in the remaining patients. Procedure durations averaged 35.8 minutes (laparoscopic) and 35.6 minutes (open). All procedures were performed by the same senior urologist team. Patients were extubated immediately post-surgery, with one requiring intensive care unit admission for 1 day. No surgical site infections or major postoperative complications occurred. The drop in hemoglobin in this study was 0.84 g/dL. Conclusion: The authors' novel HLO-RN technique is a practical and feasible approach for large renal masses, including those with IVC thrombus extension. By reducing intra-operative blood loss and open procedure duration, this hybrid technique significantly decreases perioperative morbidity.

Identifiers

PMID40827366
PMCPMC12362494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.