ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2025
Compression Rate Progression of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture in Conservative Treatments.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) aims to alleviate pain and prevent further compression; however, compression often progresses during conservative treatments. Furthermore, studies on the factors affecting compression rate progression and the timing at which compression progresses the most are limited.
methodsA total of 122 patients with OVCF, who were follow-up duration > 6 months, were included. Factors, such as age, sex, fracture levels, bone mineral density, body mass index, medications for osteoporosis, initial compression rate, fracture locations, and pelvic incidence were assessed. The compression rates were measured initially and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. The correlation between these factors and compression rate progression of > 50% was analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The compression rate progression over time was evaluated using a repeated-measures general linear model, and clinical outcomes were assessed using a paired
resultsUnivariate analysis showed that an initial compression rate of < 30% was significantly associated with progression (
conclusionAn initial compression rate of < 30% was highly correlated with compression rate progression, particularly within the first month after injury. Compression rate progression correlated with clinical outcomes in terms of pain and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.