ArticleEvidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health2024
Organizational mediators of sustainability in a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Prior systematic reviews and research have suggested that certain organizational characteristics and training methods may support the sustainability of new practices, yet these factors have not been adequately studied in behavioral health. Objective: The objective of this study was to test the indirect effects of training design (e.g., training condition and consultation call attendance) on clinician-reported sustainability through post-training organizational resources, training exposure and utilization, and organizational climate. Method: Fifty licensed outpatient clinics, including 100 clinicians, 50 supervisors, and 50 administrators were randomized to one of three training conditions: 1) Learning Collaborative (LC), 2) Cascading Model (CM) or 3) Distance Education (DE). All were trained to provide Parent Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT). Data to assess training and implementation outcomes were collected at 4 time points coinciding with the training period: baseline, 6- (mid), 12- (post), and 24-months (1-year follow-up). Multi-level path analysis was utilized to examine the role of organizational barriers and training approaches on sustainability of PCIT (caseload, protocol use, number of families seen). Results: Clinician-reported resources, training exposure and utilization, and organizational climate varied among study conditions, with the most favorable conditions reported in the CM condition and the least favorable conditions reported in the LC condition. The CM condition was associated with greater PCIT caseload, more families served by the PCIT program, and less use of the full PCIT protocol as compared to the DE condition, while the LC condition was associated with fewer families served and more use of the full PCIT protocol. Conclusions: Organizational factors such as available resources, organizational climate, and training exposure and utilization indirectly influence the effect of training approach and consultation on PCIT sustainability two years after baseline and vary based on condition. A possible mechanism of the cascading training model on sustainability, through increased organizational resources, was also identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.