ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Translation and Validation of the Swedish Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation in Ulnar Nerve Entrapment.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A prospective study of predictors of return to work after surgery for ulnar nerve entrapment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A Swedish version of the Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation (PRUNE-S), a patient-reported outcome measure for ulnar nerve entrapment, was created, according to cross-cultural adaptation guidelines, and reliability, validity, and responsiveness were evaluated. Methods: In total, 43 patients (mean [SD] age, 49 [16] y; 54% men) were consecutively examined, including the PRUNE-S (retest: 23 patients; age, 48 [19] y; 61% men) with follow-up at 3 and 12 months after intervention. Patients with conservative intervention replied to a global rating of change question. Results: The PRUNE-S sum test-retest assessment showed high Cronbach alpha value (0.99) and agreement by intraclass correlation coefficient (0.98) with good limits of agreement (PRUNE-S sum between -14 and 14). An exploratory factorial analysis showed a different PRUNE-S subscale categorization (subscale ranges: Cronbach alpha, 0.87-0.98; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.87-0.98). The subscales, except the sensory symptoms subscale, of the PRUNE-S and their sum ( Conclusions: Despite limitations in sample size, the PRUNE-S, with new subscale categorization, shows good to excellent psychometric properties with promising responsiveness and usefulness in clinical practice and research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.