ArticlePeerJ2025
The effect of rotenone contamination on high-resolution mitochondrial respiration experiments.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High-resolution respirometry is commonly used in skeletal muscle research and exercise science to measure mitochondrial respiratory function in both permeabilized muscle fibers and isolated mitochondria. Due to the low throughput and high cost of the most used respirometer, the Oroboros 2k (O2k), multiple experiments are often conducted within the same chamber in short succession. Despite this, no methodological consideration has been given for the potential contamination of inhibitors, used to investigate the contribution of specific complexes within the electron transport chain, between experiments. Methods: We first assessed the potential effect of inhibitor contamination on mitochondrial respiration experiments by evaluating the ability of the currently recommended wash protocol to remove rotenone and compared its efficacy against a simplified wash protocol of sequential rinses. Secondly, we assessed the potential effect of inhibitor contamination on mitochondrial respiration measured before and after a single session of high-intensity interval exercise, with and without the use of rotenone between experiments. Results: The currently recommended protocol for washing chambers was insufficient for removing rotenone. Following exercise, a decrease in mitochondrial respiration was observed exclusively in chambers exposed to rotenone between experiments. Discussion: Our findings highlight an important methodological consideration regarding the measurement of mitochondrial respiratory function using high-resolution respirometry, with inhibitor contamination potentially affecting the conclusions derived from experiments conducted in close succession. Future studies investigating mitochondrial respiratory function should assess the necessity of using inhibitors such as rotenone, ensure thorough wash procedures between experiments, and explicitly report the washing protocols used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.