ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2025
A Case of Oral Lichen Planus; Unresponsive to Dental Metals Removal Despite the Suspected Diagnosis of Metal Allergy.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Metal allergies can cause mucosal inflammation when triggered by dental materials. Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disorder with multiple causes, including autoimmune factors, stress, and allergic reactions to dental metals. Differentiating between OLP and metal allergies in the oral cavity can be clinically challenging. This report presents a case initially suspected to be metal allergy but later confirmed as OLP. Patients and Methods: A 55-year-old female presented with redness and pain near the buccal gingiva of the right mandibular first molar, along with white lace-like patches. Intraoral examination revealed multiple metal restorations, and element analysis identified Zn and Co in several crowns. Based on these findings, a metal allergy was diagnosed. All metal crowns were replaced with zirconia. However, symptoms persisted. A biopsy later confirmed OLP, and steroid therapy was initiated. Results: Despite removal of the suspected allergenic metals, the inflammation did not resolve, suggesting metal allergy was not the primary cause. Subsequent treatment with steroids led to gradual resolution, supporting the diagnosis of OLP as the primary condition. Conclusion: This case highlights the diagnostic difficulty in differentiating between metal allergy and OLP. Clinicians should consider OLP when symptoms persist despite metal replacement. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to achieve accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.