ArticleCureus2025
Preheating 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Reduces Curing Time in Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Pilot Randomized Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Tissue adhesives, such as 2-octyl cyanoacrylate, are widely used for tissue approximation and protection of surgical wounds during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, drying time for tissue adhesives can increase overall operating time and impede efficiency. Various methods may reduce the drying time of tissue adhesives. However, there is currently no clinical or in vivo data to support these findings. This study aims to investigate whether preheated 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond™, Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ, US) shortens drying time in robotic-assisted TKA. Methods This randomized pilot study included 40 patients undergoing TKA, and they were randomized into two groups: the intervention group received Dermabond™ preheated in a solution warmer device, while the control group received Dermabond™ at ambient temperature. Incision size, preparation, and drying times were recorded and compared. Comparison of drying time, preparation time, incision size, BMI, weight, height, age, surgery time, and gender between the preheated and control groups was conducted using the t-test, Levene's test, and the chi-squared test. Results Data from 39 patients were analyzed, as one intervention failed due to premature Dermabond™ drying in the preheated group. The drying time was reduced by an average of 26.8 seconds in the preheated group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in preparation time or incision size between the groups. Conclusion Preheating Dermabond™ reduces drying time; however, the reduction does not provide substantial time savings to alter the current TKA workflow. Improvements in intraoperative efficiency may be better achieved by optimizing other aspects of the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.