Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40827177›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Safety and Efficacy of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Trypsin, Bromelain, Rutoside, and Diclofenac in Wound Management: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Bhupesh Dewan, Siddheshwar Shinde, Nisha Motwani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bhupesh DewanMedical Services, Zuventus Healthcare Limited, Mumbai, IND.
Siddheshwar ShindeMedical Services, Zuventus Healthcare Limited, Mumbai, IND.
Nisha MotwaniMedical Services, Zuventus Healthcare Limited, Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background One of the most significant postoperative challenges faced by patients is the occurrence of acute episodes of pain and inflammation, often accompanied by the development of edema, particularly in the case of large wounds. Consequently, any delay in the healing process of such wounds can exert a substantial impact on recovery. This delay can potentially be mitigated by addressing the moisture imbalance at the wound site using proteases, while concurrently minimizing pain and inflammation through the use of appropriate analgesic and anti-inflammatory preparations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Tibrolin® D, a fixed-dose combination comprising trypsin, bromelain, rutoside, and diclofenac tablets, in alleviating pain intensity and enhancing wound healing in patients experiencing acute pain resulting from uncontaminated minor orthopedic surgical procedures or wounds. Method An open-label, multicenter, controlled, comparative Phase IV clinical study was conducted on 200 patients who underwent elective, clean, and uncontaminated minor orthopedic surgery. These patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either Tibrolin® D (a combination of trypsin 48 mg, bromelain 90 mg, rutoside 100 mg, and diclofenac 50 mg) or Voveran® 50 GE (diclofenac 50 mg) as one tablet orally, thrice a day postoperatively for seven days. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reporting adverse events. Secondary outcomes included a total wound symptom score, evaluated based on symptoms after minor orthopedic surgery using a four-point Likert scale, and pain intensity assessed by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale. Results No adverse events were observed in this study. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) in all assessed wound symptoms: erythema, edema, discharge, induration, local irritation, tenderness, and pain. By Day 7, total wound symptom scores significantly decreased in both the Tibrolin® D group (12.84 ± 2.89 to 2.24 ± 2.08) and the diclofenac group (12.86 ± 3.29 to 2.66 ± 2.28) (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.318). Pain intensity also decreased significantly in both groups by Day 7 (p < 0.001), with no significant difference in mean change between groups (p = 0.412). Notably, 91% of patients and 96% of investigators rated Tibrolin® D as good to excellent in relieving wound symptoms, comparable to ratings for diclofenac (88% and 96%, respectively). Conclusion Tibrolin® D was as well tolerated as diclofenac, indicating a favorable safety profile. The findings also suggest that Tibrolin® D improves wound healing symptoms and reduces pain intensity following minor orthopedic surgeries, demonstrating efficacy comparable to diclofenac.

Indexed as

bromelaindiclofenacfixed-dose combinationorthopedic surgerypainproteolytic enzymesrutintrypsinwound care

Identifiers

PMID40827177
PMCPMC12358076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.