ArticleCureus2025
Recurrent Periocular Nodules: Lymphomatoid Papulosis in an Uncommon Anatomic Site.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) is a rare cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorder involving the dysregulation of CD30-positive T-cells that accumulate in the skin. The accumulation of CD30-positive T-cells leads to the development of papulonodular lesions, which typically follow a protracted course and often resolve spontaneously in a matter of days to weeks. This case report describes a 44-year-old male patient who initially presented to the dermatology office with recurrent nodules under the right eye. He was diagnosed with periocular dermatitis initially, but when his condition failed to improve with minocycline, he was subsequently diagnosed with papulopustular rosacea and impetigo. However, despite multiple treatment trials, he still experienced recurrent flares with nodules that would arise only under the right eye and subsequent pain, swelling, and inflammation, which subsided as the lesions resolved. Histopathology of one of the lesions revealed a CD30-positive atypical lymphoid infiltrate, consistent with a diagnosis of LyP. Due to its close resemblance to other lymphoproliferative diseases, a diagnosis of LyP requires characteristic histological findings and a compatible clinical presentation, as neither alone is sufficient for diagnosis. This case report highlights the importance of integrating both clinical presentation and histopathologic findings to establish a diagnosis of LyP, especially when it arises in an uncommon anatomic site. LyP typically follows a benign course, but all patients diagnosed with LyP should have regular visits with a hematologist/oncologist to monitor for potential progression to malignant lymphoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.