Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40827145›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The 2025 United States Measles Crisis: When Vaccine Hesitancy Meets Reality.

Adekunle F Adeoye, Daniel O Umoru, Ousainou O Gomez, Isreal A Onifade, Benjamin O Akangbe, Ubalaeze S Elechi, Vincent U Barrah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Global vaccine development.Nature medicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adekunle F AdeoyePublic Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Daniel O UmoruPharmacy, National Hospital Abuja, Abuja, NGA.
Ousainou O GomezBiostatistics and Epidemiology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Isreal A OnifadeBiology, University of Albany, Albany, USA.
Benjamin O AkangbePublic Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Ubalaeze S ElechiRadiology, Lifechart Medical Diagnostic Services, Enugu, NGA.
Vincent U BarrahPublic Health, Chicago State University, Chicago, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review examines how declining vaccine uptake and growing vaccine hesitancy created pockets of susceptibility that enabled the outbreak and analyzes the epidemiological features and public health response. Key drivers of vaccine hesitancy (misinformation about vaccine safety, philosophical and religious exemptions, and pandemic-related disruptions) are discussed, along with the demographic patterns of under-vaccination in the U.S. Comparisons are drawn to notable measles outbreaks in Samoa (2019) and the United Kingdom (2018) to highlight common themes of insufficient immunity leading to severe outcomes. The review evaluates what aspects of the public health response were effective, including emergency vaccination campaigns, community engagement, and interagency coordination, and what challenges and failures impeded control, such as resource limitations and delayed counter-misinformation efforts. The economic impact of the outbreak is also considered, with containment efforts costing millions of dollars. We summarize the lessons learned about the importance of maintaining high vaccination coverage and suggest policy implications, which include stricter immunization requirements, proactive education to combat misinformation, and strengthening immunization infrastructure. Finally, future directions and recommendations are presented to prevent measles from regaining a foothold, emphasizing that sustained commitment to vaccination and public trust is critical to averting similar crises.

Indexed as

measlespublic health coverageunited states of americavaccination coveragevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID40827145
PMCPMC12357784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.