ReviewBiomolecules & therapeutics2025
Atopic Dermatitis Management: from Conventional Therapies to Biomarker-Driven Treatment Approaches.
Review in Biomolecules & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
- From Dysbiosis to Inflammation: Gut Microbiota and Oxidative Stress in Atopic Dermatitis.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Protective Effect of Peony (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disorder characterized by pruritus, skin barrier dysfunction, and immune dysregulation. It significantly impacts the quality of life and increases the risk of infections, sleep disturbances, and psychological distress. AD pathogenesis involves genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, microbiome alterations, and immune dysfunction. Traditional treatments such as topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and systemic immunosuppressants provide symptomatic relief but often fail to provide long-term disease control. The emergence of targeted biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors has transformed AD management by offering more precise and effective therapeutic options. However, treatment responses vary, highlighting the need for biomarker-driven personalized therapies. In this review, we explore the evolving therapeutic landscape of AD, emphasizing the emerging role of biomarker-guided treatment strategies. We highlight recent discoveries of therapeutic (OX40, IgE, IL-5, IL-31, IL-22, thymic stromal lymphopoietin) and diagnostic (TARC/CCL17, MDC/CCL2, filaggrin, sphingosine-1-phosphate, CXCL2) biomarkers that offer promising avenues for patient stratification and treatment monitoring. This review offers novel insight into how the convergence of biomarker research and therapeutic innovation can address current gaps in AD care. Future research should focus on refining biomarker-guided treatment strategies, optimizing therapeutic combinations, and addressing unmet patient needs. The integration of biomarker-guided strategies into routine clinical practice represents a critical step toward long-term disease control and improved quality of life for AD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.