Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40827039›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Listening Effort for Soft Speech in Quiet.

Hendrik Husstedt, Jennifer Schmidt, Luca Wiederschein, Robert Wiedenbeck, Markus Kemper, Florian Denk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hendrik HusstedtGerman Institute of Hearing Aids, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8748-3898
Jennifer SchmidtGerman Institute of Hearing Aids, Lübeck, Germany.
Luca WiederscheinGerman Institute of Hearing Aids, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-5744-5959
Robert WiedenbeckGerman Institute of Hearing Aids, Lübeck, Germany.
Markus KemperGerman Institute of Hearing Aids, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-4613-2451
Florian DenkGerman Institute of Hearing Aids, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3490-123X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to speech intelligibility, listening effort has emerged as a critical indicator of hearing performance. It can be defined as the effort experienced or invested in solving an auditory task. Subjective, behavioral, and physiological methods have been employed to assess listening effort. While previous studies have focused predominantly evaluated listening effort at clearly audible levels, such as in speech-in-noise conditions, we present findings from a study investigating listening effort for soft speech in quiet. Twenty young adults with normal hearing participated in speech intelligibility testing (OLSA), adaptive listening effort scaling (ACALES), and pupillometry. Experienced effort decreased with increasing speech level and "no effort" was reached at 40 dB sound pressure level (SPL). The difference between levels rated with "extreme effort" and "no effort" was, on average, 20.6 dB SPL. Thus, speech must be presented well above the speech-recognition threshold in quiet to achieve effortless listening. These results prompted a follow-up experiment involving 18 additional participants, who completed OLSA and ACALES tests with hearing threshold-simulating noise at conversational levels. Comparing the results of the main and follow-up experiments suggests that the observations in quiet cannot be fully attributed to the masking effects of internal noise but likely also reflect cognitive processes that are not yet fully understood. These findings have important implications, particularly regarding the benefits of amplification for soft sounds. We propose that the concept of a threshold for effortless listening has been overlooked and should be prioritized in future research, especially in the context of soft speech in quiet environments.

Indexed as

NoisePerceptual MaskingSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory ThresholdFemaleHumansLoudness PerceptionMaleSpeech Reception Threshold TestYoung Adulthearing thresholdlistening effortspeech in quietspeech-recognition threshold

Identifiers

PMID40827039
PMCPMC12365469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.