ReviewNeuro-oncology2025
Revisiting an old therapy for new, promising combinations: Biology and perspectives of lomustine in glioma treatment.
Review in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Saudi Patient-Derived Brain and Intracranial Explanted Tumor Cells: Isolation, Growth, and Anticancer Drug Screening.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Divergent Roles of Canonical and Non-Canonical Mismatch Repair in Regulating Temozolomide Sensitivity in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The alkylating agents temozolomide (TMZ) and lomustine (CCNU) are the most effective systemic agents for malignant gliomas. However, resistance-whether intrinsic or acquired-inevitably develops in all patients, and these tumors remain incurable. Although CCNU has demonstrated clinical benefit, its clinical use has been relatively limited due to a less favorable safety profile compared to TMZ. Recently, interest in CCNU and other nitrosoureas has been renewed in light of positive clinical trials in both adult and pediatric gliomas. Despite this renewed attention, critical questions remain unaddressed regarding the use of nitrosoureas. While resistance and response to temozolomide have been associated with the status of both MGMT and the mismatch repair DNA repair pathway, our understanding of the unique mechanisms of resistance to nitrosoureas beyond MGMT remains limited. Recent advances in molecular biology, preclinical models, and the use of longitudinal analyses of treated samples provide new insights, offering opportunities to refine clinical use and develop novel strategies. In this review, we explore the current role of nitrosoureas in glioma treatment, examine known and emerging mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance to these agents, and explore the potential for combination approaches to enhance their efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.