Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40827019›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology2025

Revisiting an old therapy for new, promising combinations: Biology and perspectives of lomustine in glioma treatment.

Charlotte Bellamy, Cynthia Hajal, Keith L Ligon, Mehdi Touat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlotte BellamyDepartment of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-8606-2447
Cynthia HajalDepartment of Bioengineering and Mechanobiology Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Keith L LigonDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Mehdi TouatHôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5910-7799

Funding

French Ministry of Education and Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The alkylating agents temozolomide (TMZ) and lomustine (CCNU) are the most effective systemic agents for malignant gliomas. However, resistance-whether intrinsic or acquired-inevitably develops in all patients, and these tumors remain incurable. Although CCNU has demonstrated clinical benefit, its clinical use has been relatively limited due to a less favorable safety profile compared to TMZ. Recently, interest in CCNU and other nitrosoureas has been renewed in light of positive clinical trials in both adult and pediatric gliomas. Despite this renewed attention, critical questions remain unaddressed regarding the use of nitrosoureas. While resistance and response to temozolomide have been associated with the status of both MGMT and the mismatch repair DNA repair pathway, our understanding of the unique mechanisms of resistance to nitrosoureas beyond MGMT remains limited. Recent advances in molecular biology, preclinical models, and the use of longitudinal analyses of treated samples provide new insights, offering opportunities to refine clinical use and develop novel strategies. In this review, we explore the current role of nitrosoureas in glioma treatment, examine known and emerging mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance to these agents, and explore the potential for combination approaches to enhance their efficacy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsGliomaLomustineAnimalsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingLomustinebiomarkerschemotherapyDNA damagegliomaprecision medicineresistance

Identifiers

PMID40827019
PMCPMC12916742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.